সোমবার, ১৪ নভেম্বর, ২০১১

1st look at Japan nuke plant: rubble amid progress (AP)

OKUMA, Japan ? Two reactor buildings once painted in a cheery sky blue loom over the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. Their roofs are blasted away, their crumbled concrete walls reduced to steel frames.

In their shadow, plumbers, electricians and truck drivers, sometimes numbering in the thousands, go dutifully about their work, all clad from head to toe in white hazmat suits. Their job ? cleaning up the worst nuclear disaster since Chernobyl ? will take decades to complete.

Reporters, also in radiation suits, visited the ravaged facility Saturday for the first time since Japan's worst tsunami in centuries swamped the plant March 11, causing reactor explosions and meltdowns and turning hundreds of square miles (kilometers) of countryside into a no man's land.

Eight months later, the plant remains a shambles. Mangled trucks, flipped over by the power of the wave, still clutter its access roads. Rubble remains strewn where it fell. Pools of water cover parts of the once immaculate campus.

Tens of thousands of the plant's former neighbors may never be able to go home. And just as Hiroshima and Nagasaki become icons of the horrors of nuclear weapons, Fukushima has become the new rallying cry of the global anti-nuclear energy movement.

Yet this picture is one of progress, Japanese officials say. It has taken this long to make the plant stable enough to allow Saturday's tour, which included representatives of the Japanese and international media ? including The Associated Press. Officials expect to complete an early but important step toward cleaning up the accident by the end of the year.

"I think it's remarkable that we've come this far," Environment Minister Goshi Hosono, Japan's chief nuclear crisis response official, said before leading the tour. "The situation at the beginning was extremely severe. At least we can say we have overcome the worst."

The group was taken through the center of the facility, a once-neat row of reactor buildings that are now shells of shattered walls and steel frames. Journalists were then briefed inside the plant's emergency operations center, a spacious, bunker-like structure where it is safe to remove the heavy protective gear required outdoors.

Woefully unprepared for the wave that swept over its breakwater, the plant just 140 miles (225 kilometers) northeast of Tokyo was doomed almost from the start.

"During the first week of the accident, I thought several times that we were all going to die," plant chief Masao Yoshida said.

At the height of the crisis, all but a few dozen workers ? dubbed the "Fukushima 50" ? were evacuated. Officials boast that number is now up to as many as 3,000 a day, compared with the pre-crisis work force of 6,400.

Evidence of the tremendous man-hours already invested in the cleanup is piling up in the workers' staging area, on the edge of the 12-mile (20-kilometer) no-go zone around the plant. More than 480,000 sets of used protective gear ? which can be worn only once ? lie in crates or plastic bags at the complex, which before the tsunami was a training facility for national-level soccer teams.

Kazuo Okawa, 56, who worked at Fukushima for 20 years, was called back to join an emergency crew for several days in April. His team wore three layers of gloves, full-face masks, double-layer Tyvek protective coveralls, rubber boots with plastic covers and plastic head covers. They carried personal Geiger counters.

"Obviously, it was very dangerous at that time," he recalled during a recent visit to Tokyo. "Luckily, we got out without experiencing any life-threatening situations."

Workers like Okawa ? in Chernobyl they were called "liquidators" ? have restored the plant's supply of electricity, set up elaborate cooling and drainage systems, rebuilt crumbled walls and erected a huge tent to cover one of the worst-hit reactors, cutting the amount of radioactivity leaking into the surrounding environment.

Tokyo Electric Power Co., which runs the plant, says it will achieve a "cold shutdown" by the end of the year ? a first step toward creating a stable enough environment for work to proceed on removing the reactors' nuclear fuel and closing the plant altogether.

But that is by no means the end of the story.

A preliminary government report released this month predicted it will take 30 years or more to safely decommission Fukushima Dai-ichi. Like Chernobyl, it will probably be encased in a concrete and steel "sarcophagus."

Hiroaki Koide, a nuclear physicist at Kyoto University, said he doubts the decommissioning process will go as smoothly as the government hopes. He said pools for spent fuel remain highly volatile, and cleaning up the three reactor cores that melted through their innermost chambers will be a massive challenge.

"Nobody knows where exactly the fuel is, or in what condition," he said. "The reactors will have to be entombed in a sarcophagus, with metal plates inserted underneath to keep it watertight. But within 25 to 30 years, when the cement starts decaying, that will have to be entombed in another layer of cement. It's just like Russian Matryoshka dolls, one inside the other."

The no-go zone around the plant will likely be in effect for years, if not decades, to come. Officials reluctantly admit that tens of thousands of evacuated residents may never be able to return home.

Recent studies suggest that Japan continues to significantly underestimate the scale of the disaster ? which could have health and safety implications far into the future.

According to a study led by Andreas Stohl the Norwegian Institute for Air Research, twice as much radioactive cesium-137 ? a cancer-causing agent ? was pumped into the atmosphere than Japan had announced, reaching 40 percent of the total from Chernobyl. The French Institute for Radiological Protection and Nuclear Safety found that 30 times more cesium-137 was released into the Pacific than the plant's owner has owned up to.

"We have not studied the content of their research, and are not in a position to respond," said Hiroki Kawamata, a TEPCO spokesman. "We have no plans at this point to modify our estimates."

Before the crisis, resource-poor Japan relied on nuclear power for about one-third of its electricity. It was planning to boost that share to 50 percent by 2030.

Without nuclear, Japan will have to import more fossil fuels, cutting its potential GDP by 1.2 percent and costing 7.2 trillion yen ($94 billion) annually, according to an estimate by the Japan Center for Economic Research.

But public support for nuclear power ? and the trust that the industry is built on ? has plummeted.

Tens of thousands of Japanese have turned out in protest. Suspicious of government and TEPCO reassurances, grassroots groups are scouring the country with radiation detectors. Several "hot spots" in and around Tokyo are now being investigated by the authorities.

Because of the outcry, Japan has essentially abandoned its long-term goal of expanding nuclear energy production. The status of even its existing plants is murky.

Currently, 43 of Japan's 54 nuclear reactors are shut down, either because of mechanical problems or routine inspections, which must be conducted every 13 months. Local approval is required to restart nuclear power plants, even after routine inspections, and local leaders fearing repercussions at the polls have been loath to provide it.

TEPCO announced two weeks ago there will be enough power to see the country through the winter, but after that, the effect of the nuclear crisis on electricity production could become even more acute. If political resistance remains as high as it is now, every nuclear reactor in Japan could be offline by May.

___

Talmadge reported from Hirono. APTN producer Miki Toda, at the plant, and writer Mari Yamaguchi, in Tokyo, contributed to this story.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/topstories/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111112/ap_on_re_as/as_japan_inside_fukushima

kenyon martin kenyon martin lizard lick towing jenny mccarthy megatron richard simmons war of 1812

CBS, Chris Columbus bringing "Rifleman" back to TV (Reuters)

LOS ANGELES (TheWrap.com) ? CBS is taking aim at a television classic.

The network is rebooting the Chuck Connors series "The Rifleman," the late-1950s ABC Western about Civil War vet and widower Lucas McCain, who takes his son and his hot-rodded Winchester rifle and settles in the New Mexico territory of North Fork, an individual familiar with the project confirms to TheWrap.

"Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone" director Chris Columbus will be directing the project, with "Shutter Island" scribe Laeta Kalogridis and "Drive Angry" writer Patrick Lussier on board to write.

CBS Television Studios and Carol Mendelsohn Productions will produce.

The original series ran on ABC from 1958 to 1963, and was unique in that it was one of the first primetime series to portray a widowed parent raise a child.

Deadline Hollywood first reported the news.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/tv/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20111111/tv_nm/us_therifleman_f

harp world series game 5 moammar gadhafi harry connick jr rightnow maurice jones drew bf3

রবিবার, ১৩ নভেম্বর, ২০১১

Rovio Opens The World?s First Angry Birds Store In Finland

Angry birds 2Look out, Sanrio. After dominating the mobile world for just shy of two years (haters be damned), Angry Birds is movin' on up into its own retail space. While Rovio plans on opening up shop in China (where the brand is huge, but next to all of the available merchandise is fake) sometime next year, this first store is on their home turf in Helsinki, Finland. It's got a massive slingshot!

Source: http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/EFvzsPS_zjw/

execution execution facebook music facebook music daphne guinness daphne guinness mortgage rates

A vocal crowd, home-state senators and serious policy discussion mark Republican debate (Star Tribune)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/161392813?client_source=feed&format=rss

moammar gadhafi harry connick jr rightnow maurice jones drew bf3 craigslist nc chronicle

শনিবার, ১২ নভেম্বর, ২০১১

Why Penn State Students Rioted—They Deify Joe Paterno

News | Mind & Brain

The psychology of group membership helps explain why Penn State students cant stop loving a man who ignored a child molestation scandal


Image: envizion/Flickr

STATE COLLEGE, Pa.?Last night I witnessed the aftermath of the brief, angry riot at Penn State: an overturned news van being righted by a bulldozer, debris from battered cars and upended trash cans littering the street, college kids in ?Joe Knows Football? t-shirts stumbling away from College Avenue with pepper sprayed red eyes and tear-stained faces, courtesy of the police. The students had reacted violently to the 10 p.m. announcement from the university's board of trustees that Joe Paterno, their beloved football coach, was fired.

As the rioters vented their rage and grief, commentators and bloggers around the world began lambasting the students for defending a man who knew about an allegedly horrific case of child abuse and did very little to try to stop it. But for these students, turning on Paterno may not be a simple matter of recognizing his moral error and reevaluating their reverence for him. Psychologists have long studied the mentality of group membership, and their research helps explain why all of us have a tendency to stick up for our idols and leaders even in the face of serious wrongdoing.

According to psychological theory, every person has a social identity, which depends on being a member of various groups. ?The social groups you belong to become a part of the very essence of who you feel you are,? explains psychologist Adam Galinsky, a professor at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University. These groups can include our families and circles of friends; the clubs, churches and schools we attend; our race, ethnicity and nationality; and the list goes on. The more strongly we identify with a particular group, the more vehemently we defend its members and ideals?a trait that experts think evolved along with early human society. Banding together and protecting one another allowed our ancestors to survive, and so to this day we are quick to cheer on our comrades and feel animosity toward rival groups. Many scientists think this in-group psychology explains prejudice, racism and even sports fandom.

Most of the Penn State students who rioted Wednesday night have social identities that are built around a lifelong allegiance to the school. If you attend Penn State, Galinsky explains, ?Penn State is you, it?s part of you, it?s such an important thing.? And nothing symbolizes Penn State more than Joe Paterno, head football coach for 46 years. Many of these distraught young adults chose to attend the university because of their love for the Paterno?s team?not the other way around. And they rioted because ?the person that symbolized the school they go to, that?s given the school stature, that?s made their own selves have meaning and purpose, has now been taken away from them in an aggressive and sullied way,? Galinsky explains.

The pros and cons of such an extreme allegiance to a sports team are a ripe topic for debate?especially in the wake of this scandal, in which it seems the needs of the football program trumped the moral imperative of the university?s leadership. But setting that aside for now, the fact remains that these particular students do have an incredibly strong identity as Nittany Lions?and recognizing that identity can help us understand their behavior. Their actions during the riot were systematic and easily explained from a social identity perspective, Galinsky points out. ?It?s understandable why they turned over the media bus,? he says. ?For them, this whole thing is being driven by the media. If it wasn?t for the media talking about the scandal 24/7, Joe Paterno wouldn?t have been forced out.?

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=ad8a7ff8a61583e66c568d46e8baea7e

playstation network down typhoon dwts elimination kelly thomas international day of peace michaele salahi jill zarin

Ken Blackwell: The Iron Lady vs. the Tin Woman

When Sec. of State Hillary Clinton is not berating Canadians in Ottawa for not pushing abortions in Africa, when she's not celebrating gay pride in Rome with Lady Gaga, when she's not counting Jews in Jerusalem, nagging Israelis about building homes for their people in their own capital, what does she do with herself?

One thing she does is try to overturn one of the greatest victories for democracy and the rule of law since World War II. Mrs. Clinton has barged into still-festering dispute over the Falkland Islands. In 1982, the Argentine military junta invaded the Falklands and immediately set about placing the peaceful islanders under their own dictatorship.

Argentina was able to invade the Falklands in 1982 because those long-held British possessions are just a few hundred miles from the coast of South America. The British government of Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher instantly rallied and quickly dispatched a war fleet on a six-week journey to the South Atlantic. One of Mrs. Thatcher's junior ministers asked if, with the departure of the fleet, this would not be a good time for another offer of peace talks to the Argentine dictators. Mrs. Thatcher's reaction was said to be "thermonuclear." That young man has not been heard from since.

Behind the scenes, the British were aided by Ronald Reagan's Defense Department. Satellite data and military intelligence reports were shared fully with our British counterparts in Whitehall.

How could the United States, the Great Republic, line up so firmly with the United Kingdom in defense of a distant colonial outpost? What about the Monroe Doctrine? What about anti-imperialism?

President Reagan recognized with no prompting that the core value was democracy and a government "by consent of the governed." The few thousand Falklanders were British down to their boots. This quiet outpost of liberty and order had been self-governing for nearly two centuries.

Argentina, by contrast, has fallen under one after another thuggish regime, military juntas alternating with neo-fascist Peronista governments elected by the famous descamisados -- shirtless ones. Think "Occupy Buenos Aires."

The Obama administration wants to be a "transformative" one in the way that Reagan's was, but in the opposite direction. Instead of asserting American Exceptionalism, instead of boldly standing for freedom and self-rule, this administration has cozied up to dictators around the world. Only Gaddafi managed to avoid its embrace. But Libya's jihadists are still hopeful of U.S. aid as they seek to set up yet another Islamist state.

Margaret Thatcher earned her "Iron Lady" sobriquet fighting the Communist-dominated unions in Britain, but her successful effort to liberate the Falklands gave her a smashing election victory over her Labour opposition in the elections that followed the lopsided victory in that war. Thatcher's supporters said she put the GREAT back in Great Britain.

By calling for "talks," Tin Woman Hillary Clinton is threatening to open up the issue of the Falklands once again. There is nothing to talk about. The Falkland Islanders want no part of Argentina, period. They don't want Argentina's military buffoonery or its worse-than-Greece economics. They especially don't want Argentina's crazy quilt politics.

Why put all that the Iron Lady won -- at the cost of hundreds of British lives -- as risk?
If we won't "meddle" in Iran, why meddle here? Why try to undo what our closest ally has achieved?

Britain today is in grave economic straits. The British government has had to give up their only aircraft carrier. It is a real question whether Britain today could mount a successful effort to rescue the Falkland Islanders should the Argentines be tempted once again to grab what they call their "Malvinas" islands. And Argentina's perennial political and economic instability make a foreign adventure a constant temptation.

Hillary Clinton is vying with Cyrus Vance for the title of worst Secretary of State in U.S. history. He quit Jimmy Carter's cabinet in 1980, not because Carter's attempt to rescue our 52 hostages in Iran failed, but because it might have succeeded.

By raising the subject of "talks" about the Falklands, Mrs. Clinton is threatening a renewed war. We know Bill Clinton has lamented he did not have a war to assure his presidential greatness. Is Hillary hoping to be called upon to negotiate the Falklands matter so she, too, can cop a Nobel Prize? If she wins one for this, let's make it tin.

?

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ken-blackwell/the-iron-lady-vs-the-tin-_b_1088867.html

barrel roll anagram 180 degrees askew cory smoot x factor results x factor results

শুক্রবার, ১১ নভেম্বর, ২০১১

Guida vs. Henderson will be ?whirlwind of hair and cardio?

Clay Guida and Ben Henderson's bout at UFC on Fox will not be aired on the debut of the UFC on network television, but it will be exciting. Knowing how both fighters have endless cardiovascular endurance and mops of curly hair, Guida described the bout that will run on Facebook as a likely "whirlwind of hair and cardio."

Guida won four fights in a row to get to this bout. Most recently, he beat Anthony Pettis in a decision. Henderson, the former WEC champ, dropped a five-round bout to Pettis in December, but since then beat Mark Bocek and Jim Miller. Lightweight champion Frankie Edgar's next bout will reportedly be the main event of UFC Japan in late February. Should it be against the winner of tomorrow's bout? Tell us in the comments or on Facebook.

Source: http://sports.yahoo.com/mma/blog/cagewriter/post/Guida-vs-Henderson-will-be-whirlwind-of-hair-a?urn=mma-wp9265

sarah palin espn body issue ijustine visionary guy kawasaki jani lane the exorcism of emily rose